As being the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been attained, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by law." It truly is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

10 . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair towards the offender and also the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more

184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as established forth would not utilize, because the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, instead he has actually been acquitted on the criminal charges based on evidence and it is actually perfectly-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted during the criminal case, then on this really charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment from the department and held him disqualified for the post because acquittal for all upcoming purposes. The aforesaid proposition is set at naught via the Supreme Court of Pakistan inside the case with the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v.

In order to preserve a uniform enforcement with the laws, the legal system adheres towards the doctrine of stare decisis

In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year old boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he had endured in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children during the home. The boy was placed in an crisis foster home, and was later shifted close to within the foster care system.

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it is effortless for your Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under check here the obligation for making an attempt to dispose of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's attained to the stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it's achieved this kind of stage. Read more

The DCFS social worker in charge with the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-thirty day period report towards the court, the worker elaborated over the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mildew the relief to make it proper on the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified because of the decision with the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty in the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set from the government.

Summaries of cases that condition the lives of younger individuals, guaranteeing a further understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and enthusiasts alike.

8. With the reasons stated earlier mentioned, this court finds the petition to be without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend during the comments, and their request is As a result acceded to. All pending applications, if any, are also dismissed. Read more

The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, apart from most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $200. It also regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it has issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.